The Poor Man's Covered Call Approach to Dividend Kings

The Dividend Kings list is the closest thing the public markets have to a durability index. To make the cut, a company has to have raised its dividend every year for at least 50 consecutive years. That filter has to survive the 1970s stagflation, the 1987 crash, the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis, and the 2020 pandemic. The list is short for a reason. Most companies do not make it.

The names on it are familiar. Coca-Cola. Procter & Gamble. Johnson & Johnson. Walmart. PepsiCo. Colgate-Palmolive. Abbott Labs. These are the businesses that compound shareholder cash through every cycle the U.S. economy has thrown at corporate America for half a century.

The honest problem with owning them is the capital. A diversified portfolio of seven Dividend Kings, one hundred shares of each, easily runs $80,000 to $120,000. For most individual traders, that is the entire account in seven positions.

The Poor Man's Covered Call resolves that constraint. Not perfectly. Not without a trade-off. But for traders who want exposure to the most durable income stocks in the market without committing the capital, the PMCC is the structure that earns its place.

What a PMCC Actually Is

A Poor Man's Covered Call replaces the 100 shares of stock in a traditional covered call with a long-dated, deep in-the-money LEAPS call option. You then sell shorter-dated calls against the LEAPS just as you would against shares.

The LEAPS acts as a stand-in for the stock. Because it is deep in the money, it has a delta near 0.80 to 0.90, which means it moves nearly dollar for dollar with the underlying. Because it is long-dated, typically nine to twelve months or more to expiration, time decay on the long leg is slow while the short leg decays fast. That is the engine of the trade. You are renting the long leg expensively but collecting on the short leg quickly.

The capital efficiency comes from not having to buy 100 shares. A January 2028 LEAPS that controls 100 shares of KO at $78.66 might cost $17 per share rather than $78. That is roughly a five-to-one reduction in capital tied up for what is functionally similar economic exposure.

The principle is the same one I made the case for in the recent piece on covered calls versus short puts. Capital efficiency matters. Structure choice is where it shows up.

Why PMCCs Work Especially Well on Dividend Kings

Three things make Dividend Kings unusually well-suited to the PMCC structure.

The first is low realized volatility. These are mature, established businesses. The stocks move slowly compared with growth names. KO sits at 19 percent implied volatility. PG at 21 percent. JNJ at 22 percent. Low volatility means the LEAPS carries relatively little extrinsic premium, which keeps the entry cost reasonable, while the short call premiums are still meaningful relative to the capital deployed.

The second is options liquidity. PMCCs require ongoing management. You roll the short call. You sometimes adjust strikes. You eventually roll the LEAPS forward as expiration approaches. Each of those decisions costs you something in bid-ask spread, and on illiquid names, that cost adds up faster than most traders appreciate. The largest Dividend Kings clear that bar without effort. KO trades roughly 29,000 contracts daily. JNJ trades 12,000. WMT trades over 87,000. PG trades 20,000. These are names where you can move in and out without paying a meaningful slippage tax.

The third is thesis stability. The reason these companies have raised their dividend for 50 years is that their businesses are durable across cycles. The investment thesis does not change quarter to quarter. That stability is exactly what you want behind a LEAPS position you intend to hold for nine to twelve months. You are not betting on a near-term catalyst. You are renting upside on a business that has compounded shareholder value through every imaginable environment.

The Dividend Trade-Off, Addressed Honestly

There is one trade-off with PMCCs on Dividend Kings that I want to address directly, because it is the question every sharp reader raises in the first paragraph.

LEAPS holders do not receive dividends. You do not own the shares with a PMCC. You own the right to buy the shares at the strike price. The dividend goes to whoever owns the stock, not to you.

For a stock category whose entire identity is the dividend, this seems disqualifying.

It is not, and here is the honest math.

Most large-cap Dividend Kings yield between 2 and 3.5 percent. KO yields about 3 percent. PG yields about 2.4 percent. JNJ yields about 3 percent. WMT yields about 1 percent. PEP yields about 3 percent.

When you run a PMCC instead of buying shares, you give up that dividend. But the capital you did not spend on the shares can sit in Treasury bills earning the risk-free rate, currently around 4 to 5 percent. The short call premiums on the PMCC typically generate another 8 to 15 percent annualized income on the capital deployed, depending on the IV environment.

The math, for most Dividend Kings, favors the PMCC. The 2 to 3 percent dividend you give up is more than offset by the T-bill yield on the freed capital plus the short call income from the position itself.

The exception is Altria. MO yields roughly 7.5 percent. That is high enough that the dividend giveup is hard to compensate for, even with freed capital earning at the risk-free rate plus short call premiums layered on top. For MO specifically, owning the shares is likely the better structure. For most other Dividend Kings, the PMCC works.

This is the kind of analysis the framework is built for. Run the numbers. Make the decision on the math.

Seven Dividend Kings That Make a Workable PMCC Portfolio

Filtering the Dividend Kings list for options liquidity and IV environment, here are seven names that fit a diversified PMCC portfolio. These are candidates, not recommendations. The framework would run them through its full ranking before any of them became actual positions. The point is to illustrate what such a portfolio could look like.

A portfolio built around these seven gets you exposure across consumer staples, healthcare, and consumer retail. It avoids tobacco, where the dividend math argues against PMCC, and utilities, where options liquidity is generally too thin for clean execution.

The Math on One Position

Let me walk through one position so the structure is concrete. KO at $78.66.

Buy the January 2028 65 strike call. Approximately 20 months to expiration. Delta around 0.83. Premium estimate: $17 per share, or $1,700 per contract.

Sell the June 19, 2026 80 strike call. Approximately 38 days to expiration. Delta around 0.40. Premium estimate: $1.20 per share, or $120 per contract.

Net debit on the position: $15.80 per share, or $1,580 per contract.

Capital deployed: $1,580. Capital that would have been required to buy 100 shares: $7,866. Capital efficiency: 5.0 to 1.

The short call premium of $120 represents 7.6 percent return on capital deployed for a 38-day cycle. Annualized linearly, that is about 73 percent. The reality is you cannot simply repeat that math twelve times. IV varies. The stock moves. Not every month produces a clean short call cycle. A reasonable expectation over a full year of running this PMCC is 30 to 50 percent gross income on capital deployed from short call premiums alone, before any appreciation in the underlying KO.

Add T-bill yield on the freed $6,286, and the total return picture starts to look meaningful.

The longer-dated LEAPS is the deliberate choice here. A nine-month LEAPS would cost less and produce a higher capital efficiency ratio on entry, but it accelerates the LEAPS roll cycle and forces you to make a re-entry decision while the position is still working. Twenty months gives the underlying thesis room to play out and pushes the LEAPS roll decision to a point where the stock has had time to move. The slightly lower efficiency ratio is worth the longer runway.

These numbers are illustrative. Real entry decisions go through the probability framework. IV environment, momentum, the 200-day moving average filter on the underlying, the broader portfolio context. The PMCC structure does not exempt a position from the framework.

Risk Reality Check

PMCCs on Dividend Kings are not risk-free, and the structure has specific failure modes worth naming.

LEAPS lose value if the stock drops significantly. A deep in-the-money LEAPS has a delta near 0.85, which means a 20 percent drop in the stock translates to roughly a 20 percent drop in the LEAPS. The position is leveraged. That cuts both ways.

The short call caps upside. If KO surges to $95 unexpectedly, the gain is capped at the short call strike plus the original short call premium. PMCCs are not the right structure when the thesis is an explosive upside move. They are the right structure when the thesis is durable compounding plus income.

Time decay accelerates on the LEAPS as expiration approaches. The position needs to be rolled forward, by closing the existing LEAPS and opening a new longer-dated one, well before that decay becomes meaningful. Standard practice is to roll when the LEAPS has 90 to 120 days remaining.

Earnings require care. Most of the Dividend Kings on the list have earnings within the next 90 days. WMT reports in roughly ten days. TGT and LOW report on a similar timeline. ABT and PG report in July. The standard discipline applies: do not let a short call sit through earnings if the strike is anywhere near at the money, and either close the short call before the report or roll to an expiration that brackets the report cleanly. The LEAPS itself absorbs earnings volatility without major issue because of its long expiration. The short call is where the earnings risk lives.

Liquidity matters more than people think. The seven names above clear the liquidity bar without strain. If you start adding less-traded Dividend Kings, the slippage on each adjustment can erode the income meaningfully. Hormel and Genuine Parts are great businesses but thin options markets. The PMCC is not the right tool there.

Key Takeaways

The Dividend Kings list is the most durable income universe in U.S. equities. Owning a diversified slice of it traditionally requires $80,000 or more in capital.

The PMCC structure delivers similar economic exposure at roughly 20 to 25 percent of the capital, by replacing the 100 shares with a deep ITM LEAPS.

PMCCs work especially well on Dividend Kings because of the low volatility, strong options liquidity, and stability of the underlying business thesis.

The dividend giveup is real but mathematically resolvable for most names. Freed capital in Treasury bills plus short call premiums more than offsets a 2 to 3 percent dividend yield. For high yielders like Altria, the shares are likely the better structure.

A diversified Dividend Kings PMCC portfolio might include KO, JNJ, PG, PEP, WMT, ABT, and CL. Seven positions. Roughly $17,000 to $20,000 in capital. Income across the portfolio while preserving most of the long-term upside. For the behavioral discipline that makes this work over a full year, position sizing is the conversation that matters most.

FAQ

What is the right LEAPS strike for a PMCC on a Dividend King?

Target a delta between 0.80 and 0.90. Deeper in the money means less extrinsic premium and tighter tracking with the underlying, at the cost of more capital per contract. For most Dividend Kings, a 0.83 delta LEAPS is a reasonable starting point. The strike that gives you that delta will be roughly 15 to 25 percent below the current stock price, depending on time to expiration and IV. The expiration matters as much as the strike: aim for 18 to 24 months out so the LEAPS has runway and the roll decision is not forced while the position is still working.

How do I handle earnings on a PMCC?

The LEAPS is largely unaffected. The long-dated extrinsic premium absorbs short-term volatility. The short call is where the risk concentrates. The standard discipline is to either close the short call before the earnings report or roll it to an expiration that brackets earnings without sitting directly above the announcement. For Dividend Kings, earnings surprises are rarer than for growth names, but the discipline still applies because the short call is where a gap move would hurt.

Should I roll the LEAPS forward each year, or close and replace?

Both approaches work. The decision turns on whether the position is still working. If the underlying thesis is intact and the LEAPS is profitable, rolling forward by closing the existing LEAPS and opening a new longer-dated one is the cleaner move. If the position is well underwater and the underlying has broken down, it may be time to close out entirely rather than commit more capital to a struggling thesis. The Mental Capital question applies: would you open this position fresh today on the same terms?

Do PMCCs qualify for the same tax treatment as long stock?

No. Option premium is taxed as short-term capital gains regardless of holding period. LEAPS held over a year may qualify for long-term treatment on any gain on the LEAPS itself, but the short call premiums are always short-term. This is one of the cases where the shares may be preferable for traders with long holding periods in taxable accounts. For specifics, consult the IRS guidance on options and capital gains.

The Dividend Kings list represents the most durable corner of the U.S. equity market. The PMCC structure makes a diversified slice of that universe accessible inside a $25,000 account without compromising the quality of the underlying businesses. For most names on the list, the dividend giveup is more than offset by the capital efficiency. For a few, the shares remain the right structure.

The framework, not the structure, makes the call. Run the numbers. The capital efficient version is usually the better answer, but only when the math agrees.

Probabilities over predictions. Same principle. Different structure.

Andy Crowder

📩 Want to see how a 24+ year professional options trader approaches the market?

Subscribe to The Option Premium, my free weekly newsletter where I share:

• Probability-based strategies that actually work: credit spreads, cash-secured puts, the wheel, LEAPS, poor man's covered calls, and more

• Real trade breakdowns with the math behind every decision

• Market insights for any environment, whether we're grinding higher, pulling back, or chopping sideways

No hype. No predictions. Just the frameworks I've used to trade options for over two decades.

📺 Want more? Follow me on YouTube for in-depth tutorials, live trade analysis, and the kind of education you won't find anywhere else.

Connect with me:

• X/Twitter

• Facebook Group

This newsletter is for educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Options trading involves significant risk and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always consult with a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.