- The Option Premium
- Posts
- ๐ Educational Corner: How to Build Your Own "Options Dividend Portfolio" Using Covered Calls and PMCCs
๐ Educational Corner: How to Build Your Own "Options Dividend Portfolio" Using Covered Calls and PMCCs
Build a systematic options income portfolio. Research-backed covered call and PMCC strategies for retirement income.

How to Build Your Own "Options Dividend Portfolio" Using Covered Calls and PMCCs
Build a systematic options income portfolio generating 15-20% annually. Research-backed covered call and PMCC strategies for retirement income.
I've been teaching options strategies for over two decades, and one conversation keeps repeating itself. A trader will come to me frustrated with their dividend portfolio, they've done everything right, selected quality companies, reinvested dividends, stayed patient. But the 3-4% annual yield just isn't enough for their retirement goals.
That's when I introduce them to what I call the "options dividend portfolio", a systematic framework that aims to generate 15-20% annual income from the same blue-chip stocks traditional dividend investors already trust.
Let me tell you about Sarah Martinez, a financial analyst from Denver who attended one of my workshops years ago in Chicago. She'd spent eight years building a $125,000 dividend portfolio yielding 3.2% annually. Quality companies, Johnson & Johnson, Apple, Walmart, but she needed more income without taking reckless risks.
Within 18 months of implementing the strategies I'm about to share with you, Sarah transformed her annual yield from 3.2% to 18.2%, collecting income monthly instead of quarterly.
The beauty of this approach? She's using the same high-quality companies she was already comfortable owning. The only difference is how she's generating income from them.
The Foundation: Why Covered Calls Work
Let me start with the basics, because understanding the mechanics is crucial to implementing this successfully.
When you own 100 shares of stock and sell a covered call against those shares, you're collecting premium in exchange for agreeing to sell your stock at a predetermined price if it rises above that level. It's that simple.
Here's what that looks like in practice with Sarah's Johnson & Johnson position.
She owns 100 shares purchased at $155 per share, a $15,500 investment. JNJ pays a respectable 3.1% dividend, generating $481 annually in four quarterly payments. That's what got her interested in JNJ in the first place.
But here's what I showed her: Every 35 days, she could sell a covered call roughly 5% above the current stock price and collect approximately $185 in premium. Over a year, that's about $1,998 in additional income, a 12.9% yield on top of her existing dividend.
Combined with JNJ's dividend, her total annual return from the position reaches 16%. That's more than five times what the dividend alone provides.
"But what if the stock gets called away?" she asked me. That's always the first question.
And my answer is always the same: If your shares get called away, you've sold them at a profit above your entry price, plus you've kept all the premium you collected. That's a win, not a loss. The key is only selling calls on stocks you're willing to sell at a profit.
The research backs this up. A 2018 University of Chicago study analyzing covered call strategies across large-cap equities found that these approaches generated 12-18% annual returns and outperformed buy-and-hold in 67% of rolling 12-month periods, with notably lower volatility.
This isn't speculation. It's probability-based income generation using blue-chip stocks.
The Game-Changer: Poor Man's Covered Calls
Now, covered calls work beautifully if you already own the stock. But what if you want exposure to Microsoft without deploying $42,000 for 100 shares?
This is where Poor Man's Covered Calls (PMCCs) become transformative. I've been using this strategy for years, and it's one of the most capital-efficient approaches I know.
Instead of buying 100 shares, you buy a single long-dated call option, what we call LEAPS (Long-term Equity Anticipation Securities), deep in-the-money, typically 18-24 months from expiration. This option moves nearly dollar-for-dollar with the stock because of its high delta (usually 0.75-0.85), effectively acting as a stock replacement.
Then you sell short-term call options against this LEAPS position, just like a traditional covered call, collecting premium every 30-45 days.
Let me show you Sarah's Microsoft position to illustrate the capital efficiency.
Rather than deploying $42,000 for 100 shares, she purchased a January 2026 $350 call option for $85 per share, or $8,500 total. She then sells 35-day call options at strikes about 5% above the current price, collecting roughly $320 per contract.
The annual income remains similar to a traditional covered call, approximately $3,840. But look at the return on capital: it jumps from 9.1% to 45.2%.
That capital efficiency allowed Sarah to run five PMCC positions instead of one traditional covered call position. She maintained diversification while dramatically improving her return on capital.
MIT research from 2020 analyzing LEAPS-based income strategies found that capital turnover advantages improved risk-adjusted returns by an average of 340 basis points annually. The academic evidence supports what I've seen work in practice for years.
Portfolio Construction: How I Build These for Clients
When I work with traders on building an options dividend portfolio, I follow a systematic allocation approach that balances risk and return.
Here's how I structured Sarah's complete portfolio:
Covered Call Positions (50% allocation):
Johnson & Johnson: $15,500 generating $170 monthly
Apple: $19,500 generating $280 monthly
Walmart: $15,000 generating $200 monthly
Coca-Cola: $12,000 generating $160 monthly
These are stocks she already owned or was comfortable owning long-term. The covered calls simply enhanced the income those positions generated.
PMCC Positions (50% allocation):
Microsoft LEAPS: $8,500 generating $320 monthly
Alphabet LEAPS: $9,200 generating $340 monthly
Amazon LEAPS: $7,800 generating $300 monthly
JPMorgan LEAPS: $6,500 generating $260 monthly
Bank of America LEAPS: $5,500 generating $240 monthly
Tesla LEAPS: $4,500 generating $180 monthly
Total monthly income ranges between $2,400 and $2,800, depending on market volatility and strike selection. Annualized, that represents approximately $30,000 in income on a $125,000 portfolio, a 24% yield.
The 50/50 allocation isn't arbitrary. Covered calls provide stability and actual dividend income on established positions. PMCCs offer capital efficiency and diversification without requiring six figures in additional capital. Together, they create a balanced income engine.
The Weekly Routine: It's Not Passive, But It's Not Difficult
I need to be honest with you about something: This isn't passive income like traditional dividend investing. Anyone who tells you it is hasn't done it long enough.
But it's also not nearly as time-consuming as most people think. I've systematized this process down to about three hours weekly, and I've taught hundreds of traders to do the same.
Here's the routine I gave Sarah:
Monday (45 minutes): Review positions expiring within seven days. Close profitable positions that have captured 50-75% of maximum potential gain. Allow clearly worthless options to expire naturally. Note any positions at risk of assignment.
Wednesday (60 minutes): Sell new covered calls and short calls against PMCC positions. Target 30-45 days to expiration, with strikes 5-10% above current prices. I use delta as a guide, typically targeting 0.15-0.20 delta for optimal probability-to-premium ratio.
Friday (45 minutes): Review overall portfolio performance, update tracking metrics, and screen for upcoming earnings announcements or dividend ex-dates that might affect position management decisions.
Sarah told me recently, "The time commitment is real. This isn't truly passive income. But three hours weekly for a 15-20% yield improvement is a trade I'm comfortable making."
That's the right perspective. You're trading time for income. The question is whether that trade makes sense for your situation.
The Risks I Make Every Client Understand
I've been doing this long enough to have seen every mistake traders make with these strategies. Before anyone implements an options dividend portfolio, I walk them through three critical risks.
Assignment risk is first. When you sell covered calls, your shares can be called away if the stock rises above the strike price. I've had traders panic about this, thinking they've "lost" their stock.
Here's how I frame it: Assignment means you've sold your shares above your purchase price, and you've kept all the premium you collected. That's a profitable outcome. The key is ensuring you're only selling calls on stocks you're willing to sell at a profit.
Capital risk on PMCCs is more serious. LEAPS options, while less volatile than short-term options, still experience significant value fluctuations. A 20% decline in the underlying stock could result in a 30-40% decline in LEAPS value.
This is why I only recommend PMCCs on companies you'd be comfortable owning anyway. If you wouldn't own Microsoft stock through a 20% correction, don't run a Microsoft PMCC. The conviction has to be there.
Opportunity cost is the third risk, and it's the one that's hardest for some traders to accept. Covered calls cap your upside potential. During significant bull runs, you will underperform buy-and-hold investors.
I tell every trader: This is a fundamental philosophical decision. Do you want consistent income, or do you want unlimited appreciation potential? You can't have both. Choose based on your goals, not based on what sounds more exciting.
Position sizing is how you manage these risks. I never recommend allocating more than 10-15% of your portfolio to any single position, regardless of conviction level. High-probability strategies still fail 20-30% of the time. Proper diversification ensures individual losses don't create portfolio-level damage.
The Academic Foundation
I base my teaching on probability and statistical edge, not market predictions or technical analysis. The academic research on covered call and synthetic covered call strategies aligns with what I've observed over two decades of implementation.
Research published in the Journal of Portfolio Management found that covered call writing on large-cap stocks generated excess risk-adjusted returns compared to unhedged equity positions, particularly during sideways and moderately bullish market environments. The strategy underperformed during sharp rallies but provided substantial downside protection during corrections.
From a probability standpoint, selling options at 0.15-0.20 delta creates 80-85% probability of expiring worthless. That's a favorable statistical edge that, when repeated consistently over many trades, generates predictable outcomes.
"Regular income, even if generated through options rather than dividends, creates positive reinforcement that helps investors maintain discipline during volatile periods."
I've seen this psychological benefit play out countless times. Monthly cash flow provides comfort that quarterly dividends simply can't match, especially during market turbulence when discipline matters most.
The key insight I try to instill in every trader: Accept that 15-20% of trades will result in losses or assignment. Size positions so those expected outcomes don't derail your overall strategy. That's probability-based thinking.
How I Recommend Implementation
When I work with traders one-on-one, I follow a methodical implementation process. Rushing into full allocation before developing systematic processes almost always leads to mistakes that undermine confidence and results.
Phase 1 (Month 1): Paper trade 2-3 positions to understand mechanics without capital risk. I tell traders to select quality companies with liquid options markets, Apple, Microsoft, Johnson & Johnson are ideal candidates. Focus on mastering execution and position tracking before committing real capital.
Phase 2 (Month 2): Initiate one small live position, either a covered call on stock you already own or a conservative PMCC on a large-cap name. Use conservative strike selection, 10% out-of-the-money, to minimize assignment risk. Track everything meticulously. This is where you learn whether you have the discipline to follow rules.
Phase 3 (Month 3): Add 1-2 additional positions if initial results meet expectations. Begin developing systematic strike selection criteria and profit-taking rules. This is when the process transitions from experimental to systematic.
Phase 4 (Months 4-6): Gradually build toward target allocation of 6-10 positions, maintaining diversification across sectors and between covered calls and PMCCs. Establish consistent weekly routines for position management.
I've refined this timeline over years of teaching. Traders who rush typically make costly mistakes. Traders who follow this methodical approach develop the skills and discipline necessary for long-term success.
Tax Considerations You Can't Ignore
One area where many traders get caught off guard is taxes. Let me address this directly because it materially affects after-tax returns.
Traditional qualified dividends receive preferential tax treatment, maximum 20% federal rate for high earners. Options premium collected from covered calls and PMCCs typically receives short-term capital gains treatment, taxed at ordinary income rates up to 37%.
For high-income traders, this tax differential can reduce the net advantage considerably. A 20% pretax return might net only 12.6% after-tax at the highest bracket, versus 16% after-tax for an equivalent qualified dividend yield.
My recommendation: Implement these strategies within tax-advantaged accounts, traditional or Roth IRAs, to eliminate the tax drag entirely. Many of my clients use IRAs for options income strategies while maintaining taxable accounts for long-term buy-and-hold equity positions.
Always consult with a tax professional familiar with options trading before implementation, particularly if you're a high-income earner in elevated tax brackets. The tax treatment can significantly impact whether this approach makes sense for your situation.
What I've Learned After Two Decades
Sarah continues running her options dividend portfolio 18 months after our initial workshop. She's refined strike selection, improved position sizing, and developed disciplined profit-taking rules that prevent the common behavioral mistakes I see traders make.
Her annual income has averaged $28,000-32,000, roughly $2,400-2,700 monthly, representing a 22-26% yield on her original $125,000 capital base. Some months exceed expectations; others fall short. But the consistency across rolling 12-month periods validates the systematic approach.
She told me recently, "I won't pretend this is better than traditional dividend investing for everyone. If you want completely hands-off income, stick with dividend aristocrats. But if you can dedicate 3-4 hours weekly and accept the increased complexity, the return improvement is substantial and measurable."
That's the balanced perspective I try to instill in every trader I work with.
After teaching this approach for over 20 years, I can tell you definitively: The strategy works. The math is sound. The probability theory is solid. The academic research confirms it.
But success depends entirely on the individual trader's discipline, time commitment, and risk tolerance. This isn't about whether the strategy works, it does. This is about whether you have the temperament to implement it successfully.
The question I ask every trader considering this approach: Are you willing to trade some time and accept additional complexity in exchange for significantly enhanced yield?
If your answer is yes, and you're willing to follow systematic rules without deviation, this approach can transform your income investing results.
If your answer is no, that's perfectly fine. Stick with traditional dividend investing. There's no shame in choosing simplicity and true passivity over complexity and higher returns.
Know yourself. Know your goals. Then choose the approach that aligns with both.
Probabilities over predictions,
Andy Crowder
Andy Crowder has been trading options for over 24 years and is the Chief Options Strategist at The Option Premium. He specializes in credit spread strategies and has taught thousands of traders how to generate consistent income from options. You can learn more about his approach at The Option Premium.
๐ฏ What You'll Learn:
Each week, you'll master actionable strategies for bullish, bearish, and neutral markets. I'll teach you how to structure trades properly: position sizing, entry logic, and risk management principles that protect your capital. You'll develop a deeper understanding of market probabilities, how to assess them, apply them, and build around them. Most importantly, you'll gain education rooted in over two decades of professional trading experience, not theory.
๐ Education That Builds Real Skills:
Most traders jump from trade to trade without understanding why. I focus on teaching you:
How to identify and evaluate probability-based setups you can use repeatedly
How to build a complete portfolio framework, not just chase individual positions
How to generate returns that compound steadily through disciplined execution
๐ฉ Join thousands of readers building a professional foundation.
Subscribe to The Option Premium and learn to trade with confidence and clarity.
Reply