The Long-Term Edge in Selling Options Premium

Most traders spend their careers hunting for an edge. They study chart patterns. They backtest indicators. They chase the next hot strategy that promises to crack the market's code.

Here's the irony: one of the most durable edges in all of finance has been hiding in plain sight for decades. It's not complicated. It's not exciting. And that's probably why so few people stick with it long enough to let it work.

Selling options premium, through strategies like credit spreads, iron condors, covered calls, and cash-secured puts, offers a probability-based edge that has been documented by academics, validated by index data, and practiced quietly by institutional traders for generations. The edge isn't theoretical. It shows up in the numbers. And if you understand why it exists, you'll understand why it's likely to persist.

Why Option Sellers Have the Odds on Their Side

The edge in selling premium comes down to a single, persistent phenomenon: implied volatility tends to overstate actual volatility.

In plain English, options are usually priced for more chaos than actually arrives.

This isn't a glitch or a market inefficiency waiting to be arbitraged away. It's structural. Investors, institutions, and portfolio managers pay up for insurance. They buy puts to protect portfolios. They buy calls hoping for lottery-ticket payoffs. And because fear is a more powerful motivator than greed, that insurance premium stays rich.

Option sellers collect that premium. They're the insurance company, not the policyholder. And just like insurance companies, they don't win every claim, but they price their policies to win over time.

A 2024 study published in Research in International Business and Finance made this concrete. Researchers Balbás and Serna found that a simple strategy of repeatedly selling certain index options and investing the proceeds in a risk-free asset outperformed buy-and-hold on both the S&P 500 and DAX over many years. Not by taking heroic risks. Not by timing the market. Just by systematically harvesting what's called the "volatility risk premium", the difference between what the market charges for uncertainty and what actually materializes.

The Cboe's own benchmark data tells the same story. Professor Oleg Bondarenko's 2019 whitepaper found that the S&P 500 PutWrite Index, which sells cash-secured puts on the S&P 500 monthly, delivered an annualized return of roughly 9.5% from 1986 to 2018. That's nearly identical to the S&P 500's 9.8% return over the same period. But here's what matters: the put-selling strategy did it with about two-thirds the volatility. Standard deviation ran around 10% versus 15% for the index.

Same return, less turbulence. That's not a trivial distinction. It means a higher Sharpe ratio, 0.65 versus 0.49, which is finance-speak for "better risk-adjusted performance." Over 32 years, the premium sellers earned essentially the same reward while taking less risk to get there.

A 2023 study in Management Science drilled deeper into who actually makes money trading options. The researchers (Hu et al.) examined account-level data and found something instructive: traders who focused on volatility strategies, delta-neutral, premium-selling approaches, achieved the highest returns and Sharpe ratios. Those using simple directional bets, like buying calls hoping for a rally, tended to underperform.

The pattern isn't subtle. Selling premium works because the odds favor the seller. Most options expire worthless. High-probability short positions, selling out-of-the-money credit spreads, for instance, might win 70% or more of the time. The losses, when they come, can be larger than the wins. But over hundreds of occurrences, the math tips in your favor.

This is the law of large numbers at work. Not gambling logic. Not hope. Just allowing a genuine edge to compound across enough trades for probability to express itself.

The Case for Managing Winners Early

Here's a truth that took me years to learn: holding a winning trade to maximum profit is often a losing strategy.

It sounds backwards. If a trade can make $500 at expiration, why would you close it when you're only up $250?

Because that last 50% of profit isn't worth the risk you're taking to earn it.

The tastytrade research team popularized a rule that has since been validated by countless backtests: manage short premium trades at 21 days to expiration or once roughly 50% of the profit has been realized. The logic is simple once you see it. After you've captured half the premium, you've extracted most of the reward. But the risk hasn't disappeared. Gamma accelerates. Assignment risk rises. And the market has just as much time to move against you as you spent getting to this point.

One trader put it perfectly: "If you're up 50% or more before reaching 50% of the days to expiration, lock in the gains. There's more time for the trade to go against you than there is additional profit to capture."

The backtests confirm this. eDeltaPro's backtesting research on short strangles found that exiting at 50% of maximum profit delivered higher total returns, a better win rate, and, crucially, lower volatility than holding to expiration. The average profit per day nearly doubled because capital was freed up to redeploy into new high-probability positions.

This is compounding in action. Not compounding returns in the traditional sense, but compounding trades. Each early exit creates an opportunity to place another bet with the same edge. Over time, that adds up to more trades, more premium collected, and a smoother equity curve.

The 21-day exit rule follows similar logic. The final three weeks before expiration contribute disproportionately to variance without adding much expected profit. Gamma risk is highest. The option's delta can swing wildly with small moves in the underlying. By rolling or closing at roughly 21 days to expiration, you avoid the period when good trades turn bad for no particularly good reason.

The goal isn't to squeeze every dollar from every position. The goal is to maximize risk-adjusted returns across your entire portfolio over time. That means taking small wins frequently, avoiding the final-week drama, and redeploying capital efficiently.

Why Selling Premium Beats Buying Options Over Time

The difference between option sellers and option buyers isn't just philosophical. It shows up in the data with uncomfortable clarity.

Buyers of options are fighting against time decay, against inflated implied volatility, and against the simple mathematical reality that most options expire worthless. They need to be right about direction, magnitude, and timing, all three, to profit. Sellers only need to be approximately right, or even not catastrophically wrong, to collect premium.

The contrast becomes stark when you compare benchmark strategies. The Cboe's PutWrite Index (PUT), which sells puts, versus the Protective Put Index (PPUT), which buys puts for downside protection.

From Bondarenko's research, from 1986 to 2018, PUT returned about 9.5% annually with 10% volatility. PPUT returned only 6.6% with 12% volatility. The seller earned more while experiencing less turbulence. Worst drawdowns were smaller. Recoveries were faster. The Sharpe ratio gap was enormous: 0.65 for sellers versus 0.33 for buyers.

That's not a close call. The put sellers were paid for bearing market risk and volatility. The put buyers paid away premiums for protection they mostly didn't need.

A 2022 study by Bryan Foltice spanning 27 years of U.S. market data found similar results for covered calls. Out-of-the-money covered call writing delivered significantly higher returns than buy-and-hold while reducing portfolio volatility. The protective put strategy, buying insurance, not only underperformed but actually increased the probability of monthly losses.

The intuition is straightforward. Time decay works against long options every single day. Implied volatility premiums mean buyers systematically overpay. Sellers collect those premiums and, more often than not, keep them.

This doesn't mean buying options is always wrong. There are moments when purchasing a call or put makes strategic sense. But as a systematic approach, repeatedly buying options hoping for outsized gains, the expected returns are negative. The strategy requires occasional large wins to offset persistent small losses, and those large wins don't come frequently enough.

Defined-risk short premium strategies flip that equation. Credit spreads and iron condors offer high win rates, limited maximum losses, and the quiet grinding of probability working in your favor. The return distribution looks different: many small wins punctuated by occasional larger losses, rather than many small losses hoping for occasional home runs.

For income-focused traders, this distinction matters. It's the difference between building wealth methodically and gambling on outlier outcomes.

How Premium Selling Performs When Markets Get Ugly

A reasonable question: if selling premium involves taking on risk, what happens when that risk materializes? When volatility explodes and the market drops 30%?

The answer depends entirely on how you structure the trade.

A 2023 historical analysis by Alberic de Saint-Cyr of 32 years of S&P 500 option data examined iron condors across different market conditions. The findings won't surprise experienced premium sellers: iron condors perform best in range-bound markets with moderately high implied volatility that subsequently mean-reverts. They struggle in sudden volatility explosions or strongly trending markets.

But here's what matters: even during market stress, properly structured premium-selling strategies have shown resilience.

The Cboe's PutWrite Index suffered during 2008. Of course it did. But the drawdown, about 33%, was significantly less severe than the S&P 500's 51% collapse. The premium acted as a buffer. The strategy recovered faster.

More important, the edge in selling premium often expands during volatility spikes. When fear dominates, option premiums become exceptionally rich. Investors overpay the most for insurance precisely when they're most frightened. That's exactly when the volatility risk premium is largest.

Selling into elevated volatility doesn't mean throwing caution aside. It means using defined-risk structures, spreads, iron condors, properly sized positions, to capture that rich premium while limiting what can go wrong. The adaptive approach documented in the Cboe's S&P 500 Iron Condor Index methodology illustrates this: selling both call and put spreads to capitalize on rich premiums while hedging tail risk on both sides.

The worst thing a premium seller can do during volatility spikes is freeze. The second worst is to abandon the strategy entirely. The premiums being offered are compensation for real risk, but if you accept that risk intelligently, with defined exposure and appropriate sizing, you're often being paid more than the risk deserves.

During calm markets, premium-selling quietly grinds out returns. During volatile markets, it offers the chance to accelerate those returns if you stay disciplined. The strategy doesn't require markets to behave any particular way. It only requires you to show up consistently, manage risk, and allow probability to work.

What This Means for Your Trading

The evidence for premium selling isn't marginal. It's substantial, long-term, and consistent across different studies, methodologies, and market conditions.

But knowing that an edge exists isn't the same as capturing it.

Premium selling is not a get-rich-quick strategy. The edge plays out over hundreds of trades and multiple market cycles. There will be drawdowns. There will be periods when the market seems determined to prove you wrong. The variance is real.

What makes the difference is staying in the game long enough for probability to express itself. That means trading small enough that no single loss ends your career. It means managing winners early to avoid giving back profits. It means using defined-risk structures so you always know your worst case. And it means showing up consistently, month after month, allowing the law of large numbers to work.

The academic research, the index data, and the experience of seasoned traders all point to the same conclusion: selling overpriced premium, with discipline and proper risk management, offers a genuine, durable edge.

Not a guarantee. Not a free lunch. But an edge.

In a market filled with noise, opinions, and promised shortcuts, that's worth quite a lot.

Probabilities over predictions,

Andy Crowder

📩 Start trading smarter and more confidently, join thousands of readers who get The Option Premium every week.

📺 Want more education and community?
🎥 Subscribe on YouTube for in-depth tutorials and live trade breakdowns.
📘 Join the conversation on Facebook for exclusive insights, discussions, and real-time updates.

Disclaimer: This is educational content only. Not investment advice. Options involve risk and aren't suitable for all investors. Examples are illustrative. Real results will vary. Talk to professionals before you risk real money