The LEAPS Collar: How to Hedge a Winning PMCC Without Adding Complexity

I remember the first time a subscriber called me in a panic about a PMCC position that had gained 40% in three months.

"Should I close it?" he asked. "What if it gives it all back?"

He wasn't worried about being wrong. He was worried about being right too early, then watching profits evaporate before his thesis fully played out.

That's when adding a protective put to your PMCC starts to make sense. Not as a strategy you plan from day one, but as a defensive adjustment when you've got gains you want to protect or exposure you're suddenly uncomfortable with.

Most options education describes this as a "collar" and gets the structure wrong. They show you a four-leg position: your LEAPS, your ongoing short PMCC call, a protective put, and a separate longer-dated short call to finance the put. Four legs, two expiration cycles, two short calls to track.

That is not how practitioners run this. The real structure is simpler, cheaper, and more elegant.

The Practitioner's Insight

Your PMCC already has a short call. You are already selling it every cycle. You are already collecting premium against your LEAPS.

That premium does not need to fund a separate position. It funds the protective put directly.

The structure is three legs, not four:

1. Your long LEAPS call (already owned).

2. A protective put at the same expiration as your PMCC call.

3. Your normal PMCC short call, which does triple duty: it generates income, it pays for the put, and it caps your upside.

No separate "collar call." No longer-dated overlay. No mismatched expirations to track. Just one extra position added to the PMCC you already run.

That third leg deserves a second look. In the textbook four-leg collar, the financing call is a separate trade you have to manage on its own schedule. In the practitioner structure, the call you would have sold anyway is the financing leg. You are not adding complexity. You are adding one position.

Understanding What You Already Own

Before adding protection, you need to clearly understand your current position.

Let's work with specifics. You bought the $80 LEAPS call on a stock now trading at $110, and you paid $28 for it eight months ago. You've been selling short calls and collecting $2 per month on average, so you've taken in $16 in premium. Your effective cost basis is now $12 ($28 minus $16 in collected premium).

Your breakeven is $92 ($80 strike plus $12 net cost). Every dollar the stock trades above $92 is profit, though that profit is capped at whatever short call strike you've sold.

Your risk is the full $12 you have invested, $1,200 for the position. If the stock craters, your LEAPS call could expire worthless and you'd lose everything you've put in.

That's your baseline. Now let's talk about reshaping it.

What the Put Actually Buys You

Most options education shows you the parts. The chart below shows you the shape.

Three things are worth seeing on this chart.

On the left (below $100). The PMCC alone bleeds to a $9 loss if the stock crashes. The PMCC plus put produces a $9.50 gain and actually gets better as the stock falls further (the put gains intrinsic value below $100 even as the LEAPS bottoms out). The gap between the two structures at a $70 stock price is roughly $28.50, an enormous swing in your favor.

In the middle ($100 to $115). The green line sits just below the amber. The two structures track each other with a small gap representing the put's cost. That gap is approximately $1.50, which is exactly the put's cost minus the call's credit increment.

On the right (above $115). Both structures cap at their respective ceilings. The PMCC alone caps at +$26. The PMCC plus put caps at +$24.50. Same shape, just $1.50 lower, because the put expires worthless and you sacrificed its cost.

This is the trade. You sacrifice $1.50 in the middle band, where the put is unused, in exchange for a dramatically better outcome on the left, where the put does its job.

What Changes, What Stays

This is worth seeing as a side-by-side, because the practitioner insight is that almost nothing changes.

Your LEAPS does not change. Your PMCC short call does not change. You sell it at the same strike, the same DTE, the same credit. You add one new position: a long put with the same expiration as your call. That is it.

The transformation is dramatic on the downside and minimal on the upside. Floor jumps from -$9 to +$9.50. Ceiling drops from +$26 to +$24.50. You buy a $18.50 improvement in your worst case for a $1.50 sacrifice in your best case.

That is the geometry every practitioner should internalize before they touch a put.

Strike Selection: Where the Real Decisions Live

The example uses a $100 put and a $115 call. Those are not the only options. Any combination of put strike and PMCC call strike creates a different trade with a different floor, ceiling, and net cost.

The matrix reveals something important: in this regime, eight of the nine combinations produce a net credit. The put is functionally free, sometimes more than free. The only debit cell is the tightest combination ($105 put with $118 call), and even that is only $0.40 out of pocket.

This is the structural advantage of using your PMCC call as the financing leg. The premium you collect from a 30 to 45 day call near the money typically exceeds the cost of an OTM put at the same expiration. The numbers usually work in your favor without you having to engineer them.

Three patterns are worth seeing in the matrix:

Down a column. Selling a higher PMCC call strike (less tight cap) generates less credit but leaves more upside room. The floor drops; the ceiling rises.

Across a row. Buying a lower put strike (looser protection) costs less but accepts a deeper drawdown before the put kicks in. The floor falls; the ceiling rises slightly because the leftover credit improves your net cost.

Diagonal. Moving from top-left to bottom-right trades tightness for credit. Tightest combination: highest floor, lowest ceiling, smallest credit. Loosest combination: lowest floor, highest ceiling, largest credit.

There is no "right" cell. There is only the cell that matches your conviction and your fear.

Time Horizon: One Cycle at a Time

Because the put expires with your PMCC call, you make this decision once per cycle. Every month you roll the call. Every month you decide whether to roll the put alongside it.

That is a real advantage over the textbook four-leg structure, where the put and the financing call live on their own schedule and you have to actively manage two different expirations.

In the practitioner structure, you treat the put as a discretionary monthly add-on. Some months you add it. Some months you don't. The decision is reversible at the next expiration.

Shorter-dated puts also let you adjust the strike as the stock moves. If you put on a $100/$115 structure today and the stock runs to $120 in 30 days, you let everything expire and roll up to a fresh $110/$125 the following month. Your protection and your cap both step up with the stock.

When to Add the Put

Not every cycle needs a put. Knowing when to skip it is just as important as knowing when to add it.

If you have minimal gains and you still believe strongly in the upside, adding a put might just lock in mediocre returns. Sell your normal PMCC call and let the trade run.

If your cost basis is already near zero from collected premium, you are playing with house money. The position cannot really hurt you anymore. The put adds complexity without buying meaningful peace of mind.

If you have gains but no specific risk window, just take profits. Closing the trade may be simpler than collaring it.

If you have gains and a specific near-term risk you want to manage, earnings, a Fed meeting, an event with a hard date, the put is the right tool. Buy it at the same expiration as your PMCC call. Let them both expire after the risk passes. Reassess next month.

The Psychological Component Nobody Talks About

Here's something I've observed over two decades: adding protection to a winning position often signals that you've made enough money to change how you feel about the trade.

That's not weakness. That's honesty.

When you first established the PMCC, you were comfortable with the risk because you had nothing to lose. Now you've got profits, and losing them feels different than never having made them at all. Behavioral finance calls this the disposition effect. We feel losses more acutely than equivalent gains.

Adding the put acknowledges this psychological reality. It says: I still believe in this trade, but I'm now playing with house money and I'd like to keep some of it. There is nothing wrong with that. It is one of the more mature approaches to position management I see.

The alternative, holding without protection because you "should" be comfortable with the risk, leads to stress, poor decisions, and eventually revenge trading when the position does give back profits.

Better to add the put, sleep well, and let your thesis continue developing within defined boundaries.

The Bottom Line

A protective put on a PMCC isn't a strategy you learn and then apply robotically. It's a tactical adjustment you make when specific circumstances, profitable positions, elevated uncertainty, upcoming events, create a mismatch between your exposure and your comfort level.

The practitioner's structure is simpler than the textbook version: three legs, one expiration, no separate collar call to manage. The PMCC's normal short call funds the put. The put protects the downside. Your existing position absorbs the addition without changing.

Done properly, it lets you stay in a trade you believe in while removing the anxiety that leads to premature exits or frozen decision-making.

Done poorly, it adds cost to positions that did not need it.

The difference comes down to honest self-assessment about what you actually believe will happen, how much risk you can genuinely tolerate, and whether the cost of protection (often near zero) is worth the peace of mind it provides.

There's no shame in admitting you've made enough money that losing it would hurt. The put is simply a tool for acknowledging that reality while staying in the game.

Use it when it fits. Skip it when it doesn't. And always, always run the numbers before you put the trade on.

Probabilities over predictions,

Andy Crowder

📩 Join thousands of readers building a professional foundation.

Subscribe to The Option Premium and learn to trade with confidence and clarity.

📺 Want more education and community?
🎥 Subscribe on YouTube for in-depth tutorials and live trade breakdowns.
📘 Join the conversation on Facebook for exclusive insights, discussions, and real-time updates.

Disclaimer: This is educational content only. Not investment advice. Options involve risk and aren't suitable for all investors. Examples are illustrative. Real results will vary. Talk to professionals before you risk real money.